Single-line order disposing of S.A. No.151 of 2024 as infructuous since the relief for possession was not taken by the Respondent Bank, leaving no sub-issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 21.11.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.151 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| rst – 11 | Mr Dileep Vishwakarma and Mr Umair Ansari (both through VC), Advocates for the Applicant. Mr Alok Mishra, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. None for other Respondents. Matter is listed today under caption ‘dismissal’. From the perusal of the record, it is clear that through this S.A., the Applicant has sought relief regarding the possession scheduled on 22.04.2024 by way of possession notice dated 01.04.2024 and the Applicant filed I.A. No.859 of 2024 for stay which was disposed of as infructuous as the Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant does not want to press the I.A. Since, the relief for possession was sought in the S.A. which was not taken by the Respondent Bank, nothing remains in the S.A. Accordingly, S.A. No.151 of 2024 stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent Bank
Other Respondents
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
