DRT-II Delhi dismissed a Strengthened Appellate Petition ex parte in default under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act as the applicant failed to appear and the loan account had been regularized.
Petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution. File consigned to records.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAlLsl2o2s SANDEEP SHARMA Vs HERO HOUSING FINANCE LTD
t7.09.2025
Item no. 27
Present: None for applicant. Mr. Sumit Goswami, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal and submitted that the loan account of the applicant has been regularized.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested inpursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default fornon- prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
94, (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
SANDEEP SHARMA
HERO HOUSING FINANCE LTD
SUSHEEL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
