The Applicant requested withdrawal of the Special Appeal as his account was regularized. The Tribunal disposed of the Special Appeal on that ground.
The Special Appeal was disposed of following the withdrawal request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/145/2025 SURAJ PAL SINGH Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
01.07.2025 Item No.25
Present: Mr. Lovish Kukkar, proxy Counsel for Ms. Sonal Chhabra, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Manav Singal, proxy Counsel for Mr. Rahul Garg, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the applicant requests for withdrawal of SA on the ground that account has been regularized. In view of this, SA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Suraj Pal Singh
ICICI Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
