This matter was heard virtually as a default appearance where the applicant was absent. The court noted the respondent's submission regarding regularization and dismissed the Special Application for non-prosecution.
Special Application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/143 l202s SURESH KUMAR GOYAL VS TATA CAPITAL LIMITED
29.t2.2025
Item no.22
Present None for applicant.
Ms. Sonia Rawat, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybridMode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appearedtoday before this Tribunal and submitted that the account ofthe applicant is regularized.
Despite repeated calls, no one appearedon behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are notinterestedin pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent SAis dismissedin default for non- prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
9\ (SUSHIL KUl,tHn'RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
SURESH KUMAR GOYAL
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
