The DRT disposed of a sale application and pending interim applications due to the applicant's non-appearance to the affidavit-supported submission that the mortgaged property had been sold, confirmed, and the sale certificate issued.
Disposed of SA along with all pending IAs for non-prosecution due to non-appearance of Applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
| Order Sheet (continuation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No.SA/ |
142/2022 M/S CHANDIMATA METAL WORKS & ORS. VS. UNION BANK OF INDIA |
Offi ti ith |
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | ce acon w date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
| 15/07/202 | None appears for Sarfaesi Applicant. | |
| 5 | Ld. Counsel Mr. P. K. Mukherjee (virtually) appears for Respondent Bank. |
|
| Ld. Counsel for Respondent Bank has filed affidavit including the letter of Applicant to the Bank stating Applicant has |
||
| no objection on measures taken by Bank for sale of the mortgaged property. Ld. Counsel for Respondent further submits that property has been sold, sale was confirmed and sale certificate was issued on 16/03/2023. Applicant did not choose to appear on 10/03/2025 and 16/01/2025. Hence, in view of the non-appearance of the Applicant and affidavit of the Respondent Bank, the SA along with all pending IAs are disposed of for non-prosecution. |
||
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
(Sne)
M/S CHANDIMATA METAL WORKS & ORS.
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
