The application under the SARFAESI Act was dismissed for default as the applicants were absent on call to the filing judge who noted non-compliance of a previous order.
Application dismissed for default due to absence of applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order Sheet
| Case No. SA | 135 of 2022 REACON ENGINEERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED –VS- INDIA |
N BANK |
|---|---|---|
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
| 9.6.2025 (Sl. No. 31) |
Ms. Poetry Dutta. … For the Respondent Bank. |
|
| None appears for the sarfaesi applicants. | ||
| Learned counsel for the respondent bank is present and submits that as per order dated 13.1.2025 the applicant is required to delete the name of the corporate debtor and the applicant may proceed against the other applicants but the order has not been complied with by the bank. |
||
| Today the applicants are absent on call. Hence, the sarfaesi application is dismissed for default. |
||
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer ac |
Reacon Engineers India Private Limited
N Bank
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
