Application for securitization dismissed by the Presiding Officer of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, due to non-prosecution by the applicant.
Securitization Application stands dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 16
Case No.SA/132/2025
NANALAL REGAR Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 01.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms. Lata Sarda, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Devendra Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the respondent bank submits that there are no compliance of the order is being done by the applicant.
Counsel for the applicant pleaded no instructions for the reason of non-compliance, therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Nanalal Regar
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
