The applicant failed to appear despite a default notice. The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the special appeal ex parte for non-prosecution.
dismissal of the special appeal in default
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/13212024
TARANNUM KHATUN Vs GIC HOUSING FINANCE LIMITEI)
29.04.2025
Item no. 34
Present None for applicant. Mr. Shivank Kumar, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records
9\
(susHrl KUFnR' RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
TARANNUM KHATUN
GIC HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
SUHAS RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
