Vijay Kumar Chourasiya v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/1306/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The provided text consists only of headers, dates, and non-substantive content (likely Form 53A headers and a remark column). No judicial reasoning, parties, or operative order is present.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
GONTD. ORDER- SHEET
¶2
PAGE NO
¶3
CASE NO
¶4
| DATE 03.0 |
DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER .7 ft$-q d-o'ofrq.e-Sfl 9fl.9.1306,/2024 2o2soTl-a-q-ficeTdfrqfrGIffidcrtYtr qffiml sor+rfr*-o'dfrgsftslqrsSt ffiq-ml 1.srrrlceTo\froqaqrent<cslrg \tao/zozsq{gqr.rqrtt z.q-o{ur6lcffid-o--{ft-qrrrqrt 3. ffi zz.tz.zozqdtrEd{$yfl.q. dqrcaqtoII-A-{f,qeliffiorq@ ftqrgmqrRa3lrtsrftirozo.os.zozqd 3rrrrkrfrrnqriofwarqorotrgtru fu-qrt'r |
REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 4.\rfl.qc-rg(o-{itgv fuowdrerqr ftriqdfurqofrdTnffiqerrd-<i en$.g.rool2025ftrro06.01.202soT5w entnqtfusnniloaqiorqgieA l1rcflrffi tfi.fu(d-ida.pur gqqrfld {ErIHradfrerqo-$fiErffiil qRrorar,gtfro-nurq-6-{ur[t;gdo-{ifr frdqggn,u\trq,rT-frBtE-€erqntw fuoqerqro{q?D{uTg"rdEwgi wri<nrGr-dirTfu-qrrrqrtt |
||
| 5.vtrt-qrfrd-oamrqnur1f,frri ft-{rq}fuf,orrqfug-dTfrT{tsfrUTql$ dstinzotqadorB{ffirvqRera gq vqzi qeT o) GiltrT qrRf, fuq-r |
¶5
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶6
PAGE NO
¶7
CASE NO
¶8
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER ernrx=rSttt |
REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 6.oil-tcra1qurFraffiG'tffiiq7+) fi6rq$,fu{rolorq-d-fi-{e-{qnnqtflI tofTfrqeio*EfliR-aorsl-gf, fu-qrrtrTr xttseTm"ftqeTsITi srkq-qilrsqrxRi6ffidqrqqtt sqRerodo-qwqrs/snqfuu-tgofu-+t sqzrseTore-dEi-fi{GTI-iqIqrRf,fuqr .rqrttxotceTtosooooo,/-(tq-dail-q) vqtftrn.dw d trd +sooooo/-(ffisaru)w-iqqrfrri qriu,t oncfuqdql{fr.(,uefouA rTEtq,1f,rftqero\g.flr$o-rGttNN furGTrAcrftcrozo.oo.zoz+qrfroft;qr .rqrt,oeontcrqrRdifuirotvrq-q 1tflrprfldFqtr {flEM"Tt Gil'is-ficeTe)osctl-EN2oz4aqqI rrqqqtfldorqqrm{urrtsdot=ITalT, fuSn-o 1s.12.2024Q\Gtffi{vs 20.12.2024o)*ffft-fiw te-{-{qtrq( |
||
| loqrrrqrIgq'a-{6r}orrrflr +sfta*r ft-oqtq-cn-{uTe-r1afr-qrrrqrt,ac frfuqe-qrfrdqrior rfifltttiqufonq qqefu-qr qrqT "TBq ,r, fuS+flc{€. $E-nfrottrf,Mqrqrfuiro01.11.2024 |
||
| u-tgofour.rur,ffi erSsx3ld-ff fuqqEffiffi{qr6<sup>30 ft-srrilF <qriqTd-iatqrorefr'r$vqzokc qKgr:fttsriofrrerEft'r$,3ltrff, sf,rqrficmof3flcfusFdf,B oft$ C-i.TrlitrdTqarqqrir\Y'reTfr+fr fu3rt}cfiqe{vrtrlfrqrd e-{gf,@-iwitX"16,er$qe,erTt |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court