Ramesh Kumar v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRT disposed of the SA as infructuous because the respondent bank submitted that the account had been upgraded and regularized.
What did the court decide?
SA disposed of as infructuous; all pending IAs disposed of.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 32
Case No.SA/128/2024
RAMESH KUMAR Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA
Date: 02.09.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Jitendra Choudhary, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Mohit Choudhary, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the Respondent submits that the account has been upgraded and regularized, so SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submissions made by Counsel for the Respondent, SA stands disposed off as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
RAMESH KUMAR
- respondent
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court