Ms Veenu Building v. Canara Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/113/2025 MS VEENU BUILDING Vs CANARA BANK
25.08.2025 Item No.10
Present: Mr.Sachin Sharma proxy for Mr. Shivamdeep Dwivedi, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.Sachin pleads no instructions. Accordingly, the present SA is hereby dismissed . File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MS VEENU BUILDING
- respondent
CANARA BANK
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court