Musharraf Ansari v. Edelweiss Asset REconstruction company limited
DRTSA/112/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
'EBTS RECOVERY TRIB rAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| a proceeding |
r | .ce action len with e |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.112/2024 17.09.2025 SL.No.47 |
Shri Gaurav Gupta Ld.Cl applicantispresent. Shri ShivanshShukla the respondent-F.I. ispresen' Ld. Counsel for the Gaurav Guptasubmitsthat notpressingtheSA. Ld.Counselforthere: hasgotnoobjectionli= In view of the fact, the S, offasnotpressed. Let the file be consign. room. Order beuploadedontI website. (di (Prava Presid (Mugish) |
unselfl 'r the Coun: II for Shri lntis It-F.I. lplicant applic ponde isdisl )sed !cord lnal’s Id tOr e Trib ctated |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Shri Gaurav Gupta
- respondent
Shri Shivansh Shukla
Coram
AI extract
Prava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court