The Tribunal noted that a retention suit was already issued and the bank proceeded in the realization case, rendering the present summary application infructuous. The SA is accordingly disposed of.
Summary application S.A. No.1097/2025 is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwith date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.1097/2025 10.12.2025 SL.No.70 |
Shri Vikas Pandey Ld.Counsel forthe applicantispresent. Shri Anoop Kumar Mishra Ld. Counsel forthe respondent bank ispresent. Ld. Counsel for therespondent bank submitsthatwithreagard totheloanaccount challengeintheSA and RC hasbeenissued and therespondentbank has proceededin RC. Ld. Counsel for theapplicantsubmits that he has got noobjectionif the SAis disposedoff. Inviewof the fact, thepresentSA beinginfructuousis disposedoff. Let the file be consigned torecord room. Order beuploadedon theTribunal’s website. (Dictated) [ (Pravas Kun,__Singh) PresidingOfficer (Mugish |
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
Applicant
Respondent Bank
Pravas Kun Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
