Sunita Chhabra v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In this default order, the Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Special Appeal because the applicant did not appear despite the matter being settled and money handed over according to the respondent bank's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Dismissing the Special Appeal in default for non-appearance.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribuna!-Il, Delhi
sA/108 12024 SUNITA CHHABRA VS HDFC BANK
17.09.2025
Item no. 25
Present None for applicant. Mr. Navin Kumar, counsel for respondentbank.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencinglhybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondentbank has appearedtoday before this Tribunal and submittedthat the matter has been settled and subjectpropefi has alreadybeen handed over to the applicant.
Despite repeated calls,no one appearedon behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicantsare not interestedin pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent SA is dismissedin default for non- prosecution.
File be consigned torecords.
C} (SUSHIL KUfiAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sunita Chhabra
- respondent
HDFC Bank
Coram
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court