Mukesh Kumar v. Punjab National Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/104/2024 MUKESH KUMAR Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
13.01.2025 Item No.2
Present: None for the Applicant. Ms. Seerat Sharma, proxy Counsel for Sh. DK Gupta, Counsel for respondent No.1/bank. None for respondent No.2&3.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 02:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mukesh Kumar
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court