Dismissed
Sandip Agrawal v. Hdfc Bank
DRTSA/103/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Approving the withdrawal of aSkill Acquisition (SA) petition after a settlement was reached between the applicant and the respondent bank, resulting in full payment of dues.
What did the court decide?
Directions to return the title deed to the applicant.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| Order Sheet | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No. SA | 103 of 2024 SANDIP AGRAWAL -VS- HDFC BANK |
|
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action date and da Signature Parties wh necessar |
| 11.9.2025 (Sl. No. 13) (Order No. 3) |
Mr. Ajit Keshari. … For the Sarfaesi Applicant. Ms. Aparajita Rao. (Virtually) … For the Respondent Bank. Ld. Advocate, Mr. Ajit Keshari, appears for the applicant and presses the withdrawal petition IA 2480 of 2025. In the above said application it was stated that the applicant has filed an application being aggrieved by the action of the bank. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings there has been a settlement between the parties and the Bank has received full and final settlement of the dues. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by the applicant and his signature is identified by advocate on record. Learned advocate for the applicant Bank also prays for direction upon the bank for return of title deed. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the SA Respondent if their response is dispensed with in this proceeding. This instant SA and any other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. Respondent bank is directed to return the title deeds to the applicant, if it is not required for other purpose. |
|
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer ac |
¶2
2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
SANDIP AGRAWAL
- respondent
HDFC BANK
Coram
AI extract
Ambuja Mohan Das
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court