Ms Jai Bhagwati Industries v. Bank of India
DRTSA/1009/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶2
PAGE NO.
¶3
CASE NO.
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA1009/24 08t05175 |
AppticantbyShri AshokBanke,Advocate Respondent by ShriShubhChoudha,Advocate. ThematterwastakenupforhearingonlA3183/25 for withdrawat. Asapprised bytheCounselforAppticanttheaccount hasatready beensettled andpraysforwithdrawing theSA. CounselforRespondentBankfairlyconsentedthat theaccounthasbeensetttedand hehasnoobjection iftheSAisatlowedtobewithdrawn. (Ra atet) P gofficer Consideringtheconsentofboththeparties,thelAis attowedandthepresentSAstandsdisposedofas withdrawn.Record be consignedto theRecordRoom. |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court