Allowed

Kuldeep Kumar v. Gic Housing Finance Ltd.

DRT19 Dec 2025RA/7/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Review Application under R.A. No.07/2024 was allowed to rectify an order passed on wrong factual premises regarding the dismissal of MA No.54 of 2024. The order passionately dismissing the former was recalled, directing the applicant to pursue afresh and listing the case for hearing.

What did the court decide?

The order dismissing MA No.54 of 2024 dated 13.09.2024 is recalled, and the matter is listed for hearing on 20.05.2026.

Date oforder or proceeding	Order withsignatureofcourt	Officeaction takenwith date
R.A. No.07/2024 19.12.2025 SL.No.07	This Review Application has been brought by the applicant to review /recalled theorderdated13.09.2024passedinMA No.54 of 2024withregardto SANo.847of 2023 title asKuldeepKumar Vs.GIC Housing Fiance Ltd. It is stated thatthe applicant had filed SA No.847 of 2023which was dismissed on 12.03.2024 for wantof non-prosecution. The applicant filed MA No.54 of2024 on 19.04.2024 for recalling of the order dated 12.03.2024 alongwith a separate applicationforcondonationof delay (7days only). It isfurthersubmittedthaton 13.09.2024 the case waslistedof hearingon recall application and wrong impressionthat condonation of delay application hasnot beenfiled;the MA was dismissed. At the submission of the Ld. Counsel for therespondent”/itis submitted thatinfact delay condonation of application wasfiled and it was available on the recordcertified copy of the same has beenfiledbythe applicant.Itissubmittedthatifthe MA No.54 of 2024 is not restored to its original position the applicant will not be possession topursuethe SAbroughtby theapplicant. Ld. Counsel for the respondent-F.I. has submitted that this ReviewApplication has beenbroughtforrecallingof theorder

Date oforder or
proceeding

Order withsignatureofcourt

Officeaction
takenwith
date

R.A. No.07/2024
19.12.2025
SL.No.07

This Review Application has been
brought by the applicant to review /recalled
theorderdated13.09.2024passedinMA
No.54 of 2024withregardto SANo.847of
2023 title asKuldeepKumar Vs.GIC
Housing Fiance Ltd. It is stated thatthe
applicant had filed SA No.847 of 2023which
was dismissed on 12.03.2024 for wantof
non-prosecution.
The applicant filed MA No.54 of2024
on 19.04.2024 for recalling of the order
dated 12.03.2024 alongwith a separate
applicationforcondonationof delay (7days
only). It isfurthersubmittedthaton
13.09.2024 the case waslistedof hearingon
recall application and wrong impressionthat
condonation of delay application hasnot
beenfiled;the MA was dismissed.
At the submission of the Ld. Counsel
for therespondent”/itis submitted thatinfact
delay condonation of application wasfiled
and it was available on the recordcertified
copy of the same has beenfiledbythe
applicant.Itissubmittedthatifthe MA No.54
of 2024 is not restored to its original
position
the
applicant
will
not
be
possession topursuethe SAbroughtby
theapplicant.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent-F.I.
has submitted that this ReviewApplication
has beenbroughtforrecallingof theorder

Cont... . . Page No.2 R.A. No.07/2024	passedin MANo.54of2024anditisno! maintainat=>Le I have considered the rival submissions. I am ofviewthatprocedurallawcan’t ut4&feD{ behand-o@ df therealjustice. I amof viewthattheorderin MA No.54 of2024 was passedunderwrongpremisesof fact andit needsrectification. In VIew ofthe fact the revIew applicationNo.07 of 2024 is allowedand orderpassedinMANo.54of2024dated1 13.09.2024 is recalled. 'eA 6+==„~„i -'Lz/// Applicant is directed to pursue the MA No.54of 2024. \D>OaeA Let MA No.54 of 2024 be listedon 20.05.2026 before the OwN. TM'\Du~~*<br>Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website (Dictated) (PravasKumar–arrrgh) PresidingOfficer
	Muqjsh

Cont... . .
Page No.2
R.A. No.07/2024

passedin MANo.54of2024anditisno!
maintainat=>Le
I
have
considered
the
rival
submissions.
I am ofviewthatprocedurallawcan’t
ut4&feD{
behand-o@ df therealjustice. I amof
viewthattheorderin MA No.54 of2024 was
passedunderwrongpremisesof fact andit
needsrectification.
In
VIew
ofthe
fact
the
revIew
applicationNo.07 of 2024 is allowedand
orderpassedinMANo.54of2024dated1
13.09.2024 is recalled. 'eA 6+==„~„i -'Lz///
Applicant is directed to pursue the MA
No.54of 2024.
\D>OaeA
Let MA No.54 of 2024 be listedon
20.05.2026
before
the OwN.
TM'\Du~~*<br>Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s
website
(Dictated)
(PravasKumar–arrrgh)
PresidingOfficer

Muqjsh

Kuldeep Kumar v. Gic Housing Finance Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Kumar v. Gic Housing Finance Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gsm Foods versus Hdfc Bank

Smt Rekha Nihlani versus Punjab National Bank

Vikas Tiwari versus Union Bank of India

State Bank of India versus Sri Vipin

Anand Kumar Shukla versus Axis Bank

Abdul Kadir Zari Art versus Punjab National Bank