Sangeeta Grover v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
DRT, Jaipur allowed a review application filed regarding DRAT orders mandating joint hearing; major application restored for immediate hearing with deposited fees to be returned.
What did the court decide?
Review application allowed; Major Application restored for immediate hearing; deposited fees to be returned.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 9
Case No.RA/10/2025 IN MA/205/2022
SANGEETA GROVER Vs BANK OF BARODA
Date: 28.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Naresh Batra, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri R N Vijay, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
This Review application has been filed pointing out to the orders of Hon’ble DRAT wherein it is observed that the both the parties should be heard.
In view of the above, this RA stands disposed of as allowed, MA be restored to its original number and be taken up today itself. DD which has been deposited be returned to the applicant after receipt of the same.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sangeeta Grover
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court