ICICI Bank Limited applied to withdraw an original application before the DRT, Jaipur. The Presiding Officer allowed the withdrawal and directed the refund of court fees. All pending interlocutory applications were also disposed of.
Prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 37
Case No. OA/970/2022
ICICI BANK LIMITED Vs MANISH CHORDIYA .
Date: 18.09.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms Garima Bhatt, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
All the pending IAs stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for withdrawal of O.A. should be allowed and court fees refunded?
ICICI BANK LIMITED
MANISH CHORDIYA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
