The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the operating agency filed by Union Bank of India as withdrawn because the debt had been cleared and the account closed by the respondent.
The OA is dismissed as withdrawn and court fees are directed to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/968/2023 UNION BANK OF INDIA Vs DALIP KUMAR
23.01.2025 Item No.66
Present: Sh. YP Singla, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Arvind Pawar, Branch Manager and has made a statement at the Bar that defendants have cleared their entire outstanding along with up to date interest and the account has since been closed. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
UNION BANK OF INDIA
DALIP KUMAR
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
