had mi the Books of accounts the course iof banking business sho' !r sho' lat bank lg disbursal of the loan amount J it had regularly cr,dit,d th, ,m,unt p,id by th, Id,f„„ let books of account. Thq Bank had also charged lterest Ifrom le to and the 'ntri relevant u/s 4 of the Bankers Boo] lee Ac1 t is also proved that le applicant bank’s claim is wi ltation ! against the defendants, lerefore, they ,r, li,bl, t, p,y th,Id„„ Accot te baI lgly, the d,f,nd,nt, „, di„,t,a t, p, the applic: bank within a period of two I moa from dat udgment fajling whi,h th, ,pplicant b,nk 'ill b itledl tl )11 th hypothecate+ „„t, a, w,11 ,s p„„n,1 p„p,+„ ,I defe The )plicant-bank has claimed certaj rate various loan accounthe OA with pendent lite and dat ts real and costs. On the basis of the f( SOUS :ores of justice ll be served if pendent-lite ani ;ere @9.00% PI arl1111rn all the above loan acdounts mo ly rate on 0 reducing b4ance from the date realization kh costs I find! that the bank has pro„,d th, ,,,+„ti,n ts favour. the result, th, O,igin,I Appli„ti+. ,u„ te ag the defend,+t n,s.3 & 4 ,nd ,g, lst the defehdant COS The defend h,t, a„ j,i„tly ,nd „V„,ny n®l, toF .es 0 Ill as applicant-b+nk ,nd th, hyp,th,Gated „„t+ personal propertynesl of the defendants are liable to be 4old.
