In an ex-parte debt recovery application, the Tribunal allowed the offence based on documented evidence. The defendants were held jointly and severally liable to pay dues secured by mortgaged properties.
The respondents are directed to pay Rs. 1,11,01,458.09 with interest and costs; OA claim secured by mortgaged properties; recovery certificate to be issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.
IN THE DEBTSRECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD DATED THISTHEOzND DAYOF SEPTEMBER, 2025
PRESENT: SH.MMESHWARKOTHE,B.COM.,L.LB. (HONS.),M'A' PRESIDINGOFFICER
ORIGINALAPPLICATION No: 784 OF 2022
H DFCBa nkLtd., 1-10-60/3, 3'dFloor, Suryodaya Complex, Begu mpet, SecunderabadMandal Hyderabad- 500016. n6p. ov itrAuthorized Signatory. Applicant'
Versus
Also at:-
C/o. Flat No.504,H. No.3-6- 161 Legend 3 APts, Himayathnagar Hyderabad - 500029.
: M/s.M Srinivas Reddy Counsel for the Applicant
Defenda nts : Ex-parte N,E
2
oA.NO.7UlZO22
:: ORDER ;:
oA,NO.784l2OZ2
iii) the applicantbank is also entitled to proceed against theperson and propertiesof defendants forrealization of its dues;
iv) the applicant bankis entitledfor the costs'
PRESIDING OFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the Original Application against the Defendants and the OA schedule properties?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
HDFC Bank Ltd.
M/s. Krishna Marketing / Mohini Jain
Mrs. Reena Jain
Mr. Rakesh Roshan Jain
Mmeshwar Kothe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
