The Debts recovery tribunal disposed of an application by the respondent bank for withdrawal of a recovery case after the defaulters deposited the dues amount in suo motu proceedings.
The present OA (application for withdrawal) stands disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA756122 24107125 |
Appticantsby ShriSandeep Singh,ManagerLaw Nonefor theDefendants AnAppticationforwithdrawatoftheCasewas fited onbehatfofAppticant-Bankon06/01/25supported withaffidavitoiShriRajesh KumarThakur,Chief Manager.ltisstatedthatAppticant-Bank hasfiled theiresentQAforrecoveryofdues againstthe Defendants.ltisfurtherstatedthatduringthe pendencyoftheOAtheDefendantshavedeposited Rs.67.74LakhandtheBank doesnot wanttopursue ca5e. Consideringtheaffidavitoftheofficerofthe Appticant-Eankthat theDefendanthasdepositedan amountofRs.67.74Lakh towardsfutlandfinal settlementofthecase,thepresent0Astands disposedofaswithdrawn'Recordbeconsignedto therecordroom. (Ra iwas Pate[) Presidingofficer DRT:JabatPur CampCourt:Raipur |
.nl/\o\l ,1 NhR.I4u f A tN |
Appticant-Bank
Defendants
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
