Hdfc Bank v. Sumit
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an original petition filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. for recovery of a personal loan. The Tribunal proceeded ex-parte against the defendant who failed to appear or file a written statement. The bank was directed to pay the principal amount, interest, and costs.
What did the court decide?
Direct the defendant to pay Rs.20,49,613.35 with interest and costs within 30 days; issue recovery certificate.
What the court decided
O.A. No. 715 of 2023
Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Delhi 4th floor, Jeevan Tara Building, Parliament Street, New Delhi
Presiding Officer: Shri Govind Ballabh Sharma
O.A. No.715 of 2023
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Plot No.31, Najafgarh Industrial Area Tower A, 1st Floor
Shivaji Marg, Moti Nagar New Delhi-110015
Applicant
Versus
Sh.Sumit Kumar s/o Sh. Parmeshwar Prasad R/o House no.B-322, Sangam Gall, New Ashok Nagar, Near Metro station New Delhi-110096
Also at:
Sh.Sumit Kumar s/o Sh. Parmeshwar Prasad Northern Railway
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the original application filed by the bank for recovery of loan dues under Section 19 of the RDB Act deserves to be allowed despite the defendant's absence.
Whether the evidence filed by the applicant bank sufficiently proved the case for recovery of the loan amount and interest.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
HDFC Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Sh. Sumit Kumar
Coram
Govind Ballabh Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court