Petitioner bank requested withdrawal of Original Application as account settled and refund of court fee. Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of the application and related Infructuous Applications, directing registry to refund court fees.
Original Application disposed; registry directed to refund court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 26
Case No. OA/682/2023
ICICI BANK LIMITED Vs NARENDRA PILANIYA
Date: 16.06.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Akash Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant None for the Defendants
In this matter, Counsel for the Applicant bank submits that account stands settled and he wants to withdraw this Original Application and prayed for refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed off. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
All the pending IAs stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
ICICI BANK LIMITED
NARENDRA PILANIYA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
