The DRT, Jaipur allowed the applicant bank's request to withdraw the application. The court directed the registry to refund the court fees, and the application was disposed of accordingly.
Withdrawal of OA allowed; refund of court fees directed to be paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 35
Case No. OA/653/2022
ICICI BANK LIMITED Vs M S BHANSALI ENTERPRISES
Date: 18.09.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms Vidisha Kaul, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant bank is entitled to withdraw the application and obtain a refund of court fees?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
ICICI BANK LIMITED
M S BHANSALI ENTERPRISES
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
