Application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear or make representation, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 26.03.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.652 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| rst -47 | None for the parties. Case called out but there is no response from either of the parties. Order-sheet of the learned Registrar dated 27.02.2025 shows that no representation was made by the parties. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, O.A. No.652 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
