The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur allowed the Applicant bank to withdraw its operating application and directed the refund of court fees. The OA was disposed of on that basis.
Allowed withdrawal of OA and directed refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 83
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Case No.OA/548/2023
RAJASTHAN GRAMIN BANK Vs MURLI MULARAM
Date: 19.12.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri R. C. Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Manu Pancholi, Counsel for the Defendants
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Rajasthan Gramin Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
