Disposed

Bank of Baroda v. Ms K.P Enterprise

DRT23 Dec 2025OA/537/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of an original application and a related interim application as withdrawn in a settlement, after the applicant bank received a portion of dues and sought withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

The original application and pending interim applications were disposed of as dismissed as withdrawn in settled. The bank was directed to seek refund of court fee from the Registrar.

Bank of Baroda versus Ms K.P Enterprise — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2025)

¶1

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

¶2

Page No.-	Order Sheet( continuation)
Case NO. OA IA/3512/202	/537/2023 5 BANK OF BARODA Vs M/S K.P ENTERPRISE & ANR.
Date of the order	Order with signature	Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary
	Ld. Advocate, Mr. Kashinath Mukherjee appears for the
23/12/2025 Sl. No. 22	Applicant Bank and presses the withdrawal petition, bearing application no. IA/3512/2025. In the above said application it is stated that the Applicant has filed a Recovery application for recovery of a sum of Rs.50,56,566.40/- including interest and other reliefs. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings there has been a settlement between the parties and the Bank has received Rs. 23,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of the dues. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, the Chief Manager of the Bank and his signature is identified by Advocate on record. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant Bank also prays for refund of application fee. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the OA defendants if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant OA and any other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. The Applicant Bank is entitled for refund of Court Fee in terms of the Rules for which the applicant may move before the Registrar of this Tribunal who may take decision in accordance with rules and regulations of the subject. IA/3511/2025 is moved which is a put up application. Since the record is put up, the IA/3511/2025 is disposed of.
	(Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer

¶3

Rina S.

¶4

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

¶5

Rina S.

Bank of Baroda v. Ms K.P Enterprise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Baroda v. Ms K.P Enterprise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karnataka Bank Limited versus Ms Shree Dayal Timber Pvt. Ltd.

Canara Bank versus Ms Jaya Shankar Iyer

Arindam Guha Thakurata versus Idfc First Bank Ltd.

Bank of Baroda versus Ms Bandana Enterprise

Bank of Baroda versus Mrs Kavita Agarwal

Punjab National Bank versus Mr Ram Prasad Naskar