Allowed

Bank of Baroda v. Mr. Qureshi Qamar Ahmed

DRT23 Jul 2025OA/528/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Hyderabad allowed Original Application No. 528 of 2024 filed by Bank of Baroda seeking recovery of Rs. 68,95,016.13 with interest from defendants jointly and severally, including security over hypothecated vehicle. Defendants appeared ex-parte.

What did the court decide?

Defendants jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 68,95,016.13 with future interest; OA claim secured by hypothecated vehicle; bank entitled to proceed against person and properties for realization;

Bank of Baroda versus Mr. Qureshi Qamar Ahmed — Contract and Commercial Disputes | DRT (2025)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS^{RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

DATED THIS^{THE 23RD DAY OF ]ULY, 2025}

¶3

PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR^{KOTHE,B.COM.,L.LB. (HONS.), M.A.} PRESIDING OFFICER

¶4

ORIGINAL APPLICATION^{No: 528 OF 2024}

¶5

Bank of Baroda., lubilee Hills Bra^nch Situated at Plot^{No.217,Road No.17} .lubilee Hills, Hyderabad -^500008. Rep. by its Assistant General Manager

¶6

....Applicant'

¶7

Versus

¶8

Mr. Qureshi Qamar^Ahmed S/o. tq bal Ahmed Qureshi Age 46 Years, Gender:^Male

¶9

R/o. H. No.9-4-87l 1/^{1, Alkareem Colony} Tolichowki, Hyderabad - 500008.

¶10

lvlrs. Karimunnisa Begum

¶11

W/o. Qu reshi Qamar Ahmed

¶12

Aged 39 Years, Gender:^Female

¶13

R/o. H. No.9-4-87l1/ 1, Alkareem Colony ...Defendants Tolichowki, Hyderabad - 500008.

¶14

: M/s. G.Venkat Sri Maitheya Counsel for the Applicant

Defendants

: Ex-Parte

:: ORDER ::

The Applicant Bank filed the^present OA for the recovery a total sum of Rs.68,95,016.13ps as on 10.10.2024 towards Loan A/c. No.18090600004751 from the defendants jointly and severally with future interest @9.20olo p.a. from the date of 21*n,r-...

./ 1:n)' )...

oA.NO.528/2024

application till the date of realization along with costs and in default for sale of hypothecated vehicle.

¶23

Summons served on D1 and 2. They were set ex-parte on 09.06.2025 as called absent and no representation.

¶24

The Applicant Bank examined Ajaya Kumar Barma, Asst. General Manager, as AW-1 and marked 11 documents through him as Ex. A.1to Ex. A.11.

¶25

Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank. perused the material placed on record.

¶26

The point that arises for consideration is:-

¶27

Whether the Applicant Bank is entiued for the claim made in the OA against the Defendants and OA hypothecated vehicle?

¶28

As stated supra, the Defendants remained ex-parte. The Evidence Affidavit coupled with the recitals in the documents viz., Exs. A.1 to A.11 marked on behalf of the Applicant Bank clinches the claim of the Applicant Bank against the Defendants. Hence, I hold that the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the OA claim to the Applicant Bank with future interest and costs.

¶29

In the result, the present Original Application No.52Bl2024 is allowed as under:^-

¶30

i) The Defendants are^jointly and severally llable to pay to . the Applica.nt Bank^ffi"r a sum of

¶31

oA.NO.528/2024

¶32

¶33

Rs.68,95,016'13ps^{as on 10'10'2024towards} Loan A/c.No.18090600004751^{with future} interest @9'20olo^{p'a. slmple from the date of} application till^{the date of realization;}

¶34

ii) the OA claim is^{secured bY way of} hypothecation of vehicle described^{in the} schedule annexed to the OA^{and the} applicant bank is entitled^{to proceed against} the same to realise its debt;

¶35

iii) the applicant bank is also entitled to^proceed against the person and^propertiesof defendants for realization of its dues;

¶36

iv) the applicant bank is entitled for the costs.

¶37

B. The Applicant Bank is directed to file Cost Memo within^{2 weeks} from the date of receipt of this Order.

¶38

Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

¶39

Communicate a copy of this order to the^parties concerned. (Dictated to the steno, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 23'd Day ofJuly,2025).

¶40

$Ytn"-.,..,1>Y '-r:'cr'^-

¶41

(RAMESHWAR KOTHE) PRESIDING OFFICER

Bank of Baroda v. Mr. Qureshi Qamar Ahmed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Baroda v. Mr. Qureshi Qamar Ahmed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bank of Baroda versus M/S. Kamal Enterprises

Hdfc Bank versus M/S Teja Sri Enterprises

Union Bank of India versus S Jagannath Reddy

Icici Bank Limited versus Mr. Vds Prakasa Rao Palepu

Smt Gulab Saraf versus Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd.

shilpa agarwal versus Indusind Bank Limited