The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of an original application filed by the applicant bank, which sought withdrawal after the account was settled, directing a refund of court fees.
Refund of court fees to the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 119
Case No. OA/511/2024
RAJASTHAN MARUDHARA GRAMIN BANK Vs SUBHASH CHANDRA Date: 03.04.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Vikram Dagur, Counsel for the Applicant None for the Defendants
In this matter, Counsel for the Applicant bank submits that account stands settled and he wants to withdraw this Original Application and prayed for refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed off. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank
Subshasa Chandra
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
