Allowed

Union Bank of India v. Pusala Rajender

DRT6 Nov 2025OA/416/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal-II allowed the bank's original application for recovery of Rs.22,59,960.22 with future interest and costs against the defendants, who remained absent. The court held the defendants jointly and severally liable and declared the mortgage proceedable.

What did the court decide?

Defendants ordered to pay Rs.22,59,960.22 with 10% pa simple interest; OA claim secured by mortgage made proceedable; recovery certificate issued.

Union Bank of India versus Pusala Rajender — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2025)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDEMBAD DATED THIS THE O6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶2

PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KoTHE, B.com., L.LB. (Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER

¶3

ORIGINAL APPLICATIoN No: 416 oF 2025

¶4

Union Bank of India., MG Road, Secunderabad Branch. Rep. by its Authorized Signatory.

¶5

.....Applicant.

¶6

Versus

¶7

Pusala Rajender, S/o.^yadaiah

¶8

Gender Male, Aged 54^years Occ: Business, H.No.6-22,^plot No.sg

¶9

/Part(North Side), Dammaiguda

¶10

H/o. Nagaram Village, Keesara Mandal Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶11

P R Niharika, D/o. Pusala Rajender Gender Female, Aged 26^years

¶12

Occ: Service, H.No.6-22, Plot No.58

¶13

/Part(North Side), Dammaiguda

¶14

H/o. Nagaram Village, Keesara Mandal Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶15

... Defendants

¶16

Counsel for the Applicant : M/s. B.praveen Kumar

Defendants

: Ex-parte

:: :: Qpf!_

The Applicant Bank filed the present OA for the recovery a total sum of Rs.22,59 ,960.22ps from the defendants jointly and severally with future interest @18o/o p.a. compounded monthly rests from 26.11.2024 till the date of realization along with costs and in default for sale of OA schedule WopeftynlV.,J

d_,/ 5.9..! .

oA,NO.416/2025

Summons served on^D1 and 2 through paper publication. TheY were set ex-parte on 16.09.2025 as called absent and^no representation.

¶25

The Applicant Bank examined M.leevan Sandeep,^Legal Manager, as AW-1 and marked 09 documents through^himas Ex. A.1 to Ex. A.09.

¶26

Appiicant right of arguments^{ls forfeitedvide docket order} dated 06.11.2025 for no representation.^{Perusedthe material} placed on record.

¶27

The point that arises for conslderation is:-

¶28

Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the oA against the Defendants and OA schedule property?

¶29

As stated supra, the Defendants remained ex-parte. The Evidence Affidavit coupled with the recitals in the documents viz., Exs. A.1 to A.09 marked on behalf of the Applicant Bank clinches the claim of the Applicant Bank against the Defendants. Hence, I hold that the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to^pay the OA claim to the Applicant Bank with future interest and costs.

¶30

In the result, the present Original Application No.41612025 is allowed as under: -

¶31

i) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Applicant Bank a sum of Rs.22,59,960.22ps with future interest qka..t"

¶32

oA.NO.415/202s

¶33

@10o/o^p.a. simple from the date of application till the date of realization;

¶34

ii) the OA claim is secured by way of mortgage of property described in the schedule annexed to the OA and the applicant bank is entitled to proceed against the same to realise its debt;

¶35

iii) the applicant bank is also entitled to proceed against the person and properties of defendants for realization of its dues;

¶36

iv) the applicant bank is entitled for the costs.

¶37

B. The Applicant Bank is directed to file Cost Memo within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of this Order.

¶38

Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

¶39

Communicate a copy of this order to the parties concerned. (Dictated to the steno, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 06th Day of November, 2025).

¶40

)un* . '-irl, -€'\*'

¶41

(RAMESHWAR KOTHE). PRESIDING OFFICER

¶42

Union Bank of India v. Pusala Rajender

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union Bank of India v. Pusala Rajender

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Yes Bank Limited versus M/S. Anjanadri Impex

Idfc First Bank Limited "Now" versus Dnrs Infracon

The Yes Bank Limited versus M/S. Lakshmi Latha Industries.

Idfc First Bank Limited "Now" versus Abdul Wadood Ahmed

Bank of India versus Sri Sai Pradeep Keetharaju

Bank of India versus Mr. Sriniwaas Kotaa