Uco Bank v. Sajan Kumar Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant prayed to withdraw the Open Application and obtain a refund of court fees. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal and directed the refund of fees, thereby disposing the OA.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of Open Application allowed; refund of court fees directed.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 116
Case No. OA/395/2022
UCO BANK Vs SAJAN KUMAR SHARMA
Date: 02.07.2025.
Present:
Smt. Santosh Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Alok Mathur, Counsel for the Defendants
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCO Bank
- respondent
Sajan Kumar Sharma
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court