Dismissed
Hdfc Bank v. M/s Nikul Cott Fab
DRTOA/368/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 06.03.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.368 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| rst - 59 | Order-sheet dated 03.10.2024 of the learned Registrar shows that none was present on behalf of the parties. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears from the conduct of the Applicant that he is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.368 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court