The DRT considered an application for withdrawal of an RTI appeal (OA 5154/125). The applicant bank withdrew the appeal after the respondent deposited Rs. 45 Lakh as settlement money, and the account was closed. The order stands disposed of as withdrawn.
The RTI appeal was treated as withdrawn, and the record was consigned to the record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO.
CASE NO.
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA36t24 72/07t75 |
Appticantsby ShriBhriguTatwar,NodalOfficer NonefortheDefendants OnbehatfofAppticant-Bankanappticationfor withdrawalofthecaselA5154125wasfitedon 15107125atongwithaffidavitofShriAshishKatra, Assistant GeneraIManager.ltisstatedthatthe Appticant-Bankhasfited thepresentOAforrecovery ofRs.93,91,209.53ptusinterestandexpensesand otherreliefsagainsttheDefendants.ltisfurther statedthatduringthependencyofthe instant0A the Defendantshave depositedRs.45Lakh asapproved underOneTimeSettlementLetterandtheaccount has been ctosedandtheApplicant-Bankdoesnot wanttoprosecutethe instantOA. |
UI^;f'T'lwql, ,,trurd (J= cl;+F+'xr- N,rt'{6ilr*-- '-( |
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe Applicant-BankthattheDefendanthasdepositedan amountofRs.45Lakhtowardsfut[andfinal setttementofthecase,thepresent0Astands disposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto therecordroom. (RamNi sPatet) Presidingofficer DRT:Jabatpur CampCourt:Raipur |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bank
Defendants
Ram Niwas Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
