Order regarding an application for compromise where the bank accepted settlement; OA disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive court reasoning or party names available in text.
Disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORD ER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA36122 73t07t75 |
Appticantsby Shri Sanjeev Dubey, Advocate DefendantsNo.-1E 2 areex-parte NonefortheDefendantNo.-3 CounselforApplicantfitedanaffidavitofShri SandeepDwivedi,SeniorManager.TheOfficerofthe BankhasdepositedthatintheinstantOA compromise/setttementhasarrivedatbetweenthe parties and asperterms and conditionsofthesaid compromisetheDefendantshavedepositedthe compromiseamountofRs.18.92Lakhandthe Appticant-Bankdoesnotwanttopresstherecovery ctaimedin the instantcase. TheCounselforAppticant furtherpraysforpermissiontowithdrawthepresent OAsincetheBankdoesnot wanttoprosecutethe instantcase. |
w |
| (RamNi sPatel) ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe AppLicant-Bank'andthesubmissionmadebythe CounselforAppticantthattheDefendanthas depositedanamountofRs. 18.92 Lakhtowards futl andfinalsetttementofthecase,thepresentOA standsdisposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedto therecordroom. Presidingofficer DRT:Jabatpur CampCourt:Raipur |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
