DRT-II allowed Applicant Bank's original application for recovery of Rs. 50,10,345/- with interest and costs from the ex-parte defendant, securing the claim via hypothecated vehicle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
PRESENT: SH, MMESHWAR KOTHE, B.Com., L.LB.(Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No: 265 OF 2025
Bank of Baroda.,
(Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) Film Nagar Branch, lubilee Hills Hyderabad. Rep. by its Chief Manager.
.....Applicant.
Versus
Mrs. Budidha Padma W/o. Mr.Budidha Narsimha, Aged 48 Years H.No.5-132, Valigonda, Nalgonda Telangana - 508112.
...Defendant
: M/s.Trivikram Chltturu Counsel for the Applicant
Defendant : Ex-parte
:: :: $_LL&
oA.NO.255/202s
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendant and OA hypothecated vehicle?
oA.NO.26sl202s
iv) the applicant bank is entitled for the costs.
.Jirrr*a.g>.,
' -ri;uu"
laAMrsnwenKorHE) PRESIDING OFFiCER
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled to recover the claimed amount from the Defendant?
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled to proceed against the hypothecated vehicle and defendant's properties?
Bank of Baroda.
Sh. M. Meshwar Kothe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
