Bank of Baroda v. Ram Sukh
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 51
Case No. OA/261/2024
BANK OF BARODA Vs RAM SUKH
Date: 18.09.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms Mamta Pareek, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BANK OF BARODA
- respondent
RAM SUKH
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court