Dismissed
Yes Bank v. Mr Tariq Ali
DRTOA/238/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Original Application dismissed for default due to non-compliance with a previous order dated 09.05.2025 requiring the applicant bank to take fresh steps for issuing notice to the defendants.
What did the court decide?
Original Application dismissed for default.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Date of order or proceeding |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| O.A. No.238/2022 09. 12.2025 SL.No.36 |
Noneappears forboththeparties. Ifindthat byearliervide orderdated 09.05.2025 the applicant bank is directedto take fresh steps for notice upon the defendants; but the order has notbeen compliedwith. Inview ofthefact, the presentOriginal Applicationisdismissedfordefault. Let the file be consigned to record room. Order beuploadedon theTribunal’s website. (Dictated) (Pravas Kumu,)ingh) PresidingOfficer |
|
| (Mugish) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
*Applicant Bank*
- respondent
*Defendants*
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court