The Autumn office was automatically dismissed as withdrawn upon the representation by applicant counsel stating that the matter had been settled for a financial sum and no further pursual was desired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/222/2022 PUNJAB AND SIND BANK Vs M/S PARAMJITARORA GOVT. CONTRACTOR
07.07.2025 Item No.42
Present: Sh. MS Rana, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Anmol Sharma, and has made a statement at the Bar that the parties have compromised the matter for a sum of Rs.17,50,000/- and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Punjab and Sind Bank
M/S Paramjit
AS Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
