The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant bank's ex-parte application for recovery of Rs 37,39,940 along with interest and costs against absent defendants.
Recovery Certificate directed to be issued for Rs 37,39,940 plus interest and costs; defendants debarred from opposing; appearance required on 08/10/2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORI IHE DEITS RECOVERY TRIBUt{AL.ttI KOIKATA PTESE,ITI.sRI KAHAL DE.
PRESIDING OFFICER.
O.A. 2lO ot 2022
DAT! OF DEtrvERy OF oRDER; OatOgtzO2S
Crnrrl Bank a body corporate consfltuted unde. the banklng Compantes (Acqulstuon and Transfe. of Uodertaklngs) Act, t97O havtng tts Head ;rn; at 112, J.c. Ro!d, Bangatorc, ptn-sOOOO2 and carrytng on tts ba;ktng ir"ri""" r.o, lts Branch Office /Reta Ass€ts Hub .t Behala Branch B, Ram Kishna Siranl, e.S._ Pamasree, Kolkata-TOOOGO wlthtn the Ju.tsdtc on of thts Ld. T.ibunal.
... Appltcant .
-Versus-
i:Tsfl,f; ff"trij:i;1;{!,,#:J::r,1,iil",l/i;,IIT'"ff :,##['i
il#fi t#,"1,hl'#!f}*;*q.J,s#d,il,i'*fftx"1"#i#i",3,"fl ii
... Oefendants.
Counsel for the Appllcant Bank: -
Mr. Pratyush Verm!, Advocate,
Set ex-pafte on 28/0812025
JUDGEMETfi
The App cant Bank fted the pres€ rEcovery ot a totar sum o, . 'nto'A' b€lng No' o'A' 2lo of 2022 on o4/0st2022 ror (Rup€es rhlrty seven Llkhs Thhy Nrn€ Thousand N,ne Hundred Forty "r " '"'*"' :1'from the Defendanetowards crsh credit Loan raci,ues rn the rorm of re; ;";: usu.l .ltetb. rnd credt Factllfles together wlth lnterest, cost and other
?
Ihe Applicant B.nk examlned 11 do l'tanager, cana. ";;; through srl ranmov Htstrv b,elng the senror ,, fm€nts (hlblt Ann€xure-A_t to Exhtbtt Annexure_t_tt.
Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Appllcant Bank.
The polnt that arlses for conslderat on ts ;
whether the App[cant Bank ts enfltled to the clatm made tn the OA against the DeFendants and OA schedule properfles as prayed for?
ORDER
Bank under Sectlon 19(22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financiat Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.
Accordrngly, the origrnal Applrcauon being 0,A. No.21o of 2022 is alowed and stands dlsposed of.
Copy of the JudgmenVFinal Order be uploaded in the Tribunal,s website. File is consigned to the Record Room.
(Dlctated to.steno, transcribed by him, corrected, signed 6nd pronounced by-me tn the open Court on the I " ;y" or september, 2O25)
( KAMAL DE ) PRESIDING OFFICER.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No, O.A. 2tO ol 2022 Canara Bank vs. l.l/s. H.S,Enterprlse & Anr.
Date of Order Order wlth signature
Order No.11
Order pronounced (vide separate sheets)
Dt.08/09/2025
In the result, O.A. 210 of 2022 is allowed costs.
Issue Recovery Certlflcate accordingly.
sh
( Kamal De )
Preslding Officer
DRT-3, Kolkata
2 issues framed by the court
whether the Applicant Bank is entitled to the claim made in the OA against the Defendants and OA schedule properties as prayed for?
whether the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the claims made in the OA with future interest and costs
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Crnrrl Bank
i:Tsfl,f; ff"trij:i;1;{!,,#:<sup>J::r,1,iil"l/i;,IIT'</sup> :
Kahal De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
