Allowed

State Bank of India v. Arpita Halder and Ors.

DRT18 Sept 2025OA/206/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of an appeal and related interim applications where the underlying debt recovery matter was settled, the bank realized the amount, and a No Dues Certificate was issued.

What did the court decide?

The main appeal and all pending applications are disposed of as withdrawn and settled amicably. The applicant bank is directed to return the original Title Deed to the defendants within 15 days.

State Bank of India versus Arpita Halder and Ors. — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2025)

¶1

Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation )

¶2

CaseNo.OA/2	06/202j State BankofIndia itaHalder &Ors.
DateofOrder	Orderwithsignature	Otficeactionwith date and dated Signatureoa pani€s when L ^ne.essa.y
OrderNo.07 Dt.18.09.2025 Sl.No.15	lA/3295/25istakenupforhearing. Heard Ld.CounselappearingforApplicantBank. Considered. Noneappearsfrom theside oftheDefendant. Present: ForApplicant:Ld.CounselM. K.Manna ForDefendant:None	_
S5	LdCounselfortheApplicantfitedI.A.No.3295 of 2025in viewofthe fact that theO,A which wasfiledseeking recoveryofRs.23,71,030.55/-issetfledandhasprayed forwithdrawalof thepresent O.A.Theapplicationis supportedbyaffidavitofSriSatyajitChowdhury,Chief Managerof the applicantBank. DuringthependencyoftheO.A.thedefendanthave compromisedandsettledthematterandtheApplicant Bankhasrealizedandreceivedthesetfledamountand issuedthe 'NoDues Certificate'andmade prayerto disposeofthematterfornonprosecution,Thereisno otherimpedimentifprayerissoallowed. Accordingly,I.A. No. 3295of2025 isdisposedofaswithdrawn andsetfled amicably.I.A.No. 3294of2025beingthe putuppetition isalso disposedof. TheApplicant is directedtoreturntheoriginalTifleDeed totheO.A,defendants,ifitisnot already done,within15 daysfromthe date of this order,asperrules. O.A. No. 206of2023 alongwithallpendingLA.s, ifany, isdisposedaswithdrawnbeingsettledamicably. FilebeconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobservingall formalities. I
	(KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata

State Bank of India v. Arpita Halder and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank of India v. Arpita Halder and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bank of Baroda versus M/S S S Enterprise and Ors.

Canara Bank versus Arif Mondal and Ors.

Subrata Ghosh versus Aadhar Housing Finance Limited

Icici Bank Limited versus Bhasdeep Infrastructure Development Limited and Ors.

Canara Bank versus Shambhu Kumar Gupta and Anr.

Canara Bank versus Ms Kalyani Bag