Disposed
Hdfc Bank v. Monirul
DRTOA/203/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The order disposed of an IA filed by HDFC BANK seeking a refund of court fee on payment by debtor during pendency of recovery proceedings. It did not adjudicate the underlying dispute but dispensed with respondent response and dismissed the IA as non-prosecution allowing fee refund per rules.
What did the court decide?
refund of court fee to applicant bank allowed; other pending IAs dismissed as non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| Page No.- Case NO. OA |
Order Sheet( continuation) /203/2025 HDFC BANK Vs. MONIRUL MONDAL |
|
|---|---|---|
| Date of the order |
Order with signature | Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary |
| 08/05/2025 | Ld. Advocate Ms. M. Kanji appears for the Applicant Bank and pressing the withdrawal petition IA/1289/2025. In the above said application it was stated that the Applicant has filed an Recovery application for recovery of a sum of Rs.33,49,286.10 including interest and other reliefs. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings Borrower have paid the amount due. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by Ms. Sanchari Chakraborty, the Manager of the Bank and his signature is identified by Advocate on record. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant Bank also prays for refund of application fee. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the OA defendants if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant OA and any other pending IAs are disposed of as non-prosecution. The Applicant Bank is entitled for refund of Court Fee in terms of the Rules for which the applicant may move before the Registrar of this Tribunal who may take decision in accordance with rules and regulations of the subject. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
HDFC BANK
- respondent
MONIRUL MONDAL
Coram
AI extract
Ambuja Mohan Das
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court