A withdrawal application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was allowed. The original writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, ordering refund of court fees if Rules permit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 29.07.2025 | Esh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.197 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Shadab Siddiqui i/b Mr R.L. Motwani, Advocate for the Applicant. None for the Defendants. |
|||
| rst - 26 | 7 | Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.1210 of 2025 supported by affidavit (exhibit-7) for withdrawal of the O.A. No.197 of 2025. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Defendant Bank does not want to proceed with the matter. In view of the submissions made, the I.A. No.1210 of 2025 is allowed and O.A. No.197 of 2025 stands disposed of as withdrawn. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund the court fees if the Rules permit. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant Bank
Defendant Bank
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
