The Presiding Officer disposed of a writ petition seeking recovery of bank dues. The court noted that the parties had arrived at an amicable settlement and the amount was paid. Consequently, the ongoing applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of O.A. 88 of 2023 and other pending applications as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order Sheet
| Case No. O Date of the Order |
A 185 of 2022 BANK OF BARODA –VS- FORTUNE EXPORTS ALAM Order with Signature |
Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
|---|---|---|
| 10.2.2025 (Sl. No. 2) |
Mr. M.K. Singh, Ms. Suparna Biswas. … For the Applicant Bank. |
|
| The applicant bank has filed IA 185 of 2022 praying for withdrawal of O.A. 88 of 2023 seeking recovery of Rs.3,17,37,450.72p. During the pendency of the matter, the applicant and the defendant have arrived at a compromise and settled the dues of the applicant in the instant OA and have paid Rs.1,15,00,000.00 in full and final settlement of the outstanding dues. In view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, the instant I.A. and all other pending I.As are disposed of along with O.A. 185 of 2022 in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. The applicant bank is entitled for refund of Court Fee in terms of the Rules for which the applicant may move before the learned Registrar of this Tribunal who may take decision in accordance with rules and regulations of the subject. File be consigned to the record room. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer ac |
2
Office action with Date of date and dated Order with Signature Signature of the Order Parties whennecessary
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bank of Baroda
Fortune Exports Alam
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
