The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the bank applicant to withdraw its Original Application (O.A.) and directed the refund of court fees.
Withdrawal of the original application allowed; refund of court fees ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 87
Case No.OA/1359/2022
UNION BANK OF INDIA Vs MS DEEPAK POULTRY FARM
Date: 13.11.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
ShriYash Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Abhishek Bairwa, Counsel for the Defendants
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
UNION BANK OF INDIA
MS DEEPAK POULTRY FARM
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
