Allowed

Punjab National Bank v. Sh. Amritpal Singh

DRT13 Aug 2025OA/1183/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The DRT allowed the bank's application for recovery of Rs. 29,10,967/- with interest granted as a KCC loan, holding that the bank proved its case and ordering the issue of a recovery certificate along with proceedings against the mortgaged land.

What did the court decide?

Recovery of Rs. 29,10,967/- with interest allowed. Recovery certificate issued. Recovery Officer directed to sell mortgaged land and distribute proceeds.

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Amritpal Singh — Contract and Commercial Disputes | DRT (2025)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH

¶2

BEFORE: A S NARANG, PRESIDING OFFICER

¶3

OA No: 1183/2022 Date of Institution: 04.06.2022 Date of Decision: 13.08.2025

¶4

Punjab National Bank having its branches all over India and a branch at Qadian Road, Batala Tehsil Batala, District Gurdaspur, Punjab.

¶5

……..Applicant Vs.

¶6

Sh. Amritpal Singh s/o Sh. Balwinder Singh

¶7

Sh. Balwinder Singh s/o Sh. Banta Singh Both r/o Village Ainekot, Tehsil Batala, District Gurdaspur, Punjab ……….Defendants

¶8

Advocates

¶9

Sh. Ankit Kaushal, Counsel for the applicant bank. Defendants - ex parte vide order dated 14.02.2023 .

¶10

OA for the Recovery of Rs.29,10,967/- with interest @8.80% per annum with yearly rests from 04.06.2022.

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Punjab National Bank has filed this application under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (RDB Act) for the recovery of Rs.29,10,967/- with interest against Sh. Amritpal Singh and another (defendants).

¶13

Bank’s case is that on 07.09.2017, it had granted a loan of Rs.20.00 Lacs to defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in the form of K.C.C Limit for agricultural purpose. To secure the loan, Defendant No.1 had mortgaged his land (fully detailed in para No.3A of the application). The loan was chargeable to interest @8.80% per annum with yearly rests. On 30.03.2022, a sum of Rs.29,10,967/- was due from the defendants. The defendants had duly acknowledged their liability towards the debt on 17.07.2020. Despite repeated requests, defendants did not make the repayment. Hence, this application.

¶14

¶15

3. On 06.07.2022, summonses were sent to the defendants by registered post, which were duly served. However, defendants did not put in appearance. Vide order dated 14.02.2023, they were proceeded_ex parte_.
4. In order to prove its case, the Bank has placed on record the affidavit of Sh. Naresh Gupta, Authorized Officer along with the loan and security documents and marked them as Exhibit A-1 to A-9.
5. I have perused the evidence on the record. I am of the considered view that the Bank has proved its case that it had advanced the loan of Rs.20.00 Lacs and on 30.03.2022, a sum of Rs.29,10,967/- was due.
6. Accordingly, the application of the bank for the recovery of
Rs.29,10,967/- (Rupees Twenty Nine Lacs Ten Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Seven Only) with interest @8.80% per annum with yearly rests from 04.06.2022, till the date of payment is hereby allowed with costs. The
liability of both the defendants would be joint and several. Bank can recover its dues by the sale of mortgaged land fully detailed in para No.3A of the application as well as from the personal movable and immovable property(ies) of the defendants.
7. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of.
8. Recovery Certificate be issued accordingly.
9. Parties are directed to appear before Recovery Officer on
23.09.2025,who is directed to distribute the sale proceeds of the
mortgaged land and standing crops as per the provisions of Section 19(20- AB) of the Act.
10. A Copy of this order along with Recovery Certificate be sent to the
Recovery Officer as well as the parties.
Pronounced in the open Court. (A S Narang) Dated: 13.08.2025 Presiding Officer DRT-1, Chandigarh MANOJ KALRA

Punjab National Bank v. Sh. Amritpal Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punjab National Bank v. Sh. Amritpal Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanis.P.P versus Bank of India

Central Bank of India versus Smt.Laxmi Devi

Bank of India versus M/S Shanti Industries

Punjab National Bank versus M/s Piyush Enterprises

Union Bank of India versus Ms Tirtha Tea Traders and Ors.

Punjab National Bank versus Baljinder Singh