Canara Bank v. Sh.Jitesh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of O.A. No. 1135/2023 as withdrawn by the applicant bank, which had settled the account and filed a withdrawal application.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforderor proceeding |
Order with signature of court | Officeaction takenwith date |
|---|---|---|
| O.A. No. 1135/2023 10.12.2025 SL.No.45 |
BH Ld. Counsel for theapplicantbank ispresent. Shri Dinesh Kumar Ld. Counsel forthe defendantispresent. Ld. Counsel for the applicantbank submits that in this case account hasbeen settled and withdrawal application hasbeen filedbytheapplicantbank. Inviewofthe fact,the presentOriginal Application is disposedoffas withdrawan. Let the file be consigned to record room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) (F<br>(Pravas Kh, oingh) PresidingOfficer (Mugish) |
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant Bank
- respondent
Defendant
Coram
Pravash Khongh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court