Axis Bank v. Ajit Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal returned the application with court fees to the applicant bank, directing it to file fresh proceedings before the DRT Chandigarh regarding jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Application returned to the applicant bank along with court fees for filing before the appropriate court (DRT Chandigarh).
What the court decided
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
oAlLL27l2o2s A)GS BANK Vs AIIT SINGH WALLEH
t8.L2.2025
Item no. 19
Present: shri Deepak Jain, counsel for applicant bank. Matter is taken through video conferen cingl Hybrid Mode.
The Ld. counsel for the applicant bank has submitted that the present matter has been wrongly filed before this Tribunal and the same ought to have been filed before the Hon'ble DRT chandigarh. It is prayed that the present oA along with court fees may be returned to the applicant bank for filing the same before the appropriate court.
In view of the above submission made by the Ld. counse! for the applicant bank, Registry is directed to return the oA no.tl27l2025 along with court fees to the applicant bank for filing before the appropriate couft.
File be consigned to records.
9-Ar.
(susHrl KUTVRR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
Parties & counsel
- applicant
ALM BANK
- respondent
ALL SINGH WALLEH
Coram
sushil KANTI TRIPATHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court